Skip to content
Sparehawk

Main navigation

Categories

Industrial Automation0
Machine tools & CNC0
Welding & cutting0
Electrical0
Pneumatics0
Hydraulics0
Compressors & vacuum0
Motion & drives0
Motors0
Sensors & vision0
Process instruments0
Food & beverage processing0
Packaging & printing0
Medical & laboratory0
Water & wastewater0
Robotics0
Agriculture & forestry0
Construction & mining0
Material handling0
Marine & rail0
Commercial vehicles0
HVAC & refrigeration0
Energy & renewables0
Electronics & components0
All categories
LanguageEnglish

Building a spare-parts BOM that is worth having

How to go from a machine with no parts list to a bill of materials you can quote, stock against and hand to the next engineer.

Author
Mykola Piatkov
Reading time
4 min read
Published
  • bom
  • maintenance
  • sourcing

Most plants have some kind of parts list. Very few have one that can be sent to a supplier and priced without a phone call. The gap between the two is a week of work per line and it repays itself the first time something stops.

What a usable BOM contains

One row per part, and these columns:

Column Why it is there
Manufacturer Half of all part numbers are ambiguous without it
Manufacturer part number Exact, including functional version
Description So a human can sanity-check the number
Quantity in machine Drives criticality and order quantity
Location / tag Panel and terminal designation, so it can be found
Criticality Does the line stop without it
Lifecycle status Active / phase-out / discontinued, with the date checked
Current spare qty What is actually on the shelf

Everything else — supplier, price, lead time — belongs in the quote, not in the BOM. Prices in a parts list are out of date the day after they are entered and they are the main reason parts lists stop being maintained.

Getting the numbers

Three sources, in order of reliability.

The machine's own electrical documentation. The panel schedule and the wiring diagram carry article numbers for everything in the cabinet. If the machine came with an as-built set, this is a day's work rather than a week's.

The rating plates. For anything undocumented, photograph the plate. A photograph is better than a transcription: you will misread 0 for O and 1 for I at least once, and the photograph settles it later.

The controller. A PLC project lists the hardware configuration with order numbers for every module in every rack. For Siemens, the hardware configuration in STEP 7 or TIA Portal; for Rockwell, the I/O tree in Studio 5000. This is the fastest way to get an accurate I/O list and it is frequently more correct than the drawings.

Cleaning the numbers

Raw lists are messy in predictable ways, and fixing them is what makes the list quotable.

  • Normalise spacing and separators. 6ES7 315-2EH14-0AB0 and 6ES7315-2EH14-0AB0 are the same part.
  • Resolve ordering codes and legacy numbers. A number from a 2004 drawing may have been superseded twice. Cross-reference tables cover many of these; our per-manufacturer cross-reference pages are built exactly for this.
  • Separate the brand from the number. "SIEMENS 3RT2026-1BB40" in one cell becomes two cells.
  • Drop the consumables. Cable ties, terminals and fuses belong in a stores catalogue, not in a critical spares BOM. Fuses are the exception worth arguing about: include them if the machine uses an unusual rating.
  • Mark what you could not resolve rather than deleting it. An unresolved row with a photograph is still useful; a deleted row is gone.

Turning it into stock

The list is not the goal — the decision is. For each row, the question is whether to hold one.

A workable rule for a plant without a formal criticality model: hold a spare when (cost of downtime per hour × hours to obtain the part) > (cost of the part × 3). The factor of three is a crude allowance for the cost of holding stock and the chance you never need it. Run that over a fifty-row list and it will usually pick twelve to twenty parts, which is a shelf you can justify.

Then check the lifecycle status of those twelve to twenty first. A discontinued critical part with no spare is the single highest-value thing this whole exercise finds.

Keeping it alive

A BOM that is not maintained is worse than none, because people trust it. Two habits keep it honest:

  1. Every time a part is replaced, the row is touched — quantity on the shelf, and the date. Make it part of the work order, not a separate task.
  2. Re-check lifecycle status quarterly for the critical rows only. That is ten minutes with a list of twenty part numbers.

Getting it quoted

Once the list exists, pricing it should be one upload rather than fifty searches. On this site a BOM upload matches every line against the catalogue at once, tells you which lines resolved and which did not, and turns the resolved ones into a single request that reaches every supplier able to cover a line.

The unresolved lines are the valuable output of that first upload. They are the parts nobody in your plant can currently identify, and they are exactly the ones that will be a problem at 3 a.m.

All guides